Apple and Meta Oppose Canada's Bill C-22 Over Encryption Concerns
Bill C-22 in Canada has tech giants like Apple and Meta worried about privacy.

Apple and Meta United Against Bill C-22
Apple and Meta are on the same side, opposing a Canadian bill that could shake up digital privacy and security. Bill C-22 is making these tech titans uneasy due to its potential impacts on encryption.
The bill aims to expand Canadian law enforcement's investigative powers. While it doesn't spell out encryption, Apple warns the broad powers could force companies to compromise their secure services.
"At a time of rising and pervasive threats from malicious actors seeking access to user information, Bill C-22, as drafted, would undermine our ability to offer the powerful privacy and security features users expect from Apple," Apple told Reuters.
Not Apple's First Rodeo
Apple's no stranger to encryption battles. It tangled with the UK over similar issues, leading to changes in policy there. Remember the San Bernardino case? Apple held firm against the FBI on building a backdoor.
Apple insists it won't "build a backdoor or master key" for its products.
Meta's echoing these worries. Their execs claim the bill could make companies compromise encryption and maybe even install government spyware.
What's Driving Bill C-22?
Canada's ruling Liberal Party, now with a parliamentary majority, is pushing Bill C-22. It's part of a bigger push to give law enforcement better tools for digital investigations.
Tech Companies' Key Concerns:
- Being forced to create backdoors in encrypted services.
- The risk of installing government spyware.
- Threats to zero-knowledge security architectures.
Global Context
Governments and tech firms have danced around encryption issues before. Balancing privacy and security is a global headache. The US and UK have faced similar pushback.
The Unanswered Questions:
- Will Canada tweak the bill to ease privacy fears?
- How will this affect Canada's ties with big tech?
- Could this spark similar moves in other countries?
Why It Matters:
The outcome here could shape digital privacy worldwide. If Bill C-22 passes unchanged, encryption protecting user data could be at risk. This could set a worrying precedent for government access to digital info. As threats keep evolving, strong encryption is key to user privacy.
This debate highlights the need for a balance between national security and individual privacy. With Apple and Meta leading the charge, a lot rides on the outcome.
More from Security

Major Data Breach Affects Instructure, Impacting 8,809 Schools
ShinyHunters hacked Instructure, swiping data from 8,809 schools. They've threatened to leak it if no deal is struck.

Virginia Man Convicted for Destruction of 96 Federal Databases
A former contractor has been convicted for erasing 96 federal databases, exposing vulnerabilities in government cybersecurity.

Four New Android Trojans Target Over 800 Apps: Stay Alert!
Four new Android trojans are targeting over 800 apps, stealing login data and conducting unauthorized transactions.

JDownloader Hack Puts Users at Risk of Malware
JDownloader's official site hacked, compromising Windows and Linux installers with malware.