Samsung QN90F Neo QLED vs LG OLED C5: The 2024 TV Showdown

Neo QLED vs OLED: Which premium TV fits your living room?

Serhat Er — Founder & Editor-in-ChiefBy Serhat Er·Founder & Editor-in-Chief·Jun 01, 2026·9 min read
Updated Aug 07, 2026
Samsung QN90F Neo QLED vs LG OLED C5: The 2024 TV Showdown
Byte-Pulse original cover. Source story: Byte-Pulse Original.

Samsung QN90F Neo QLED vs. LG OLED C5: The Definitive Head-to-Head

So, you're standing at the digital checkout, €1,500 or more burning a hole in your pocket, staring at two very different, very premium TVs. The Samsung QN90F Neo QLED, promising blinding brightness and vibrant colours. And the LG OLED C5, the latest iteration of a panel technology celebrated for its perfect blacks and infinite contrast. Both are top-tier, both cost a pretty penny, and both will undoubtedly elevate your viewing experience. But which one is your TV? That's where we come in. We're here to lay out the facts, the figures, and the real-world trade-offs, not to crown a winner, but to make the choice crystal clear for you.

This isn't about which TV is 'better' in a vacuum. It's about which TV is better for you. The one that aligns with your viewing habits, your room's lighting, and your priorities. We’ve sifted through the spec sheets and considered the user experience to give you the unbiased breakdown you deserve.

Ad

The 30-second summary

The Samsung QN90F Neo QLED is built for bright rooms, excelling with its immense peak brightness, vibrant colours, and excellent reflection handling, making it a fantastic choice for daytime viewing or rooms with significant ambient light. The LG OLED C5, on the other hand, offers unparalleled black levels and infinite contrast, ideal for dark room cinema experiences and gaming, with near-perfect viewing angles. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize brightness and room adaptability (Samsung) or perfect blacks and cinematic contrast (LG).

Specs at a glance

FeatureSamsung QN90F Neo QLED (65-inch)LG OLED C5 (65-inch)
Price (approx.)€1,700€1,500
Panel TypeMini-LED (VA)OLED (WOLED)
Peak Brightness~2000 nits (HDR)~1000 nits (HDR)
Contrast RatioExcellent (Local Dimming)Infinite
Black LevelsVery DeepPerfect
ProcessorNeo Quantum Processor 8KAlpha 11 Gen 5 AI
Refresh Rate120Hz (up to 144Hz on PC)120Hz
HDR SupportHDR10, HLG, HDR10+HDR10, HLG, Dolby Vision
Gaming FeaturesVRR, ALLM, FreeSync Premium ProVRR, ALLM, G-Sync Compatible
SoundObject Tracking Sound+AI Sound Pro
Smart TV PlatformTizenwebOS
Viewing AnglesGood (Anti-Reflection)Near-Perfect

Note: Prices are approximate and subject to change based on retailer and sales.

Design and Build

Both the QN90F and the C5 represent the pinnacle of modern TV design, focusing on slim profiles and premium finishes. Samsung's QN90F sports a more traditional, yet still very sleek, aesthetic with a sturdy build. Its standout design feature is its exceptional anti-reflection screen, which Samsung calls 'Ultra Viewing Angle with Anti Reflection'. This layer is remarkably effective, significantly reducing glare even in brightly lit environments. LG's C5 continues the tradition of LG's OLEDs with an incredibly thin panel, especially towards the top, and a minimalist stand. While it doesn't have the same aggressive anti-reflection coating as the Samsung, its inherent contrast makes reflections less distracting in darker settings. For a room that gets a lot of natural light, Samsung's engineering in this area is a clear advantage.

  • This leans toward the Samsung QN90F for people who: Prioritize a TV that can handle bright, sunlit rooms with minimal glare, or who appreciate a robust, premium feel with advanced anti-reflection technology.
  • This leans toward the LG OLED C5 for people who: Prefer an ultra-slim, minimalist design that blends seamlessly into a more subdued viewing environment, and are less concerned with direct light reflection.

Display: Brightness vs. Perfect Blacks

This is the core battleground. Samsung's Neo QLED technology, utilizing Mini-LED backlighting with Quantum Dots, allows the QN90F to achieve astonishing peak brightness levels, often exceeding 2000 nits in HDR content. This translates to incredibly vibrant colours, dazzling highlights, and a picture that pops even in a well-lit room. The VA panel ensures deep blacks for an LCD, enhanced by sophisticated local dimming, but it cannot eliminate blooming entirely.

LG's C5, being an OLED, has self-emissive pixels. This means each pixel can be turned off completely, resulting in true, absolute blacks and an infinite contrast ratio. While its peak brightness is lower than the QN90F (around 1000 nits for its brightest pixels), the impact of perfect blacks on perceived contrast and detail in dark scenes is profound. For movie nights in a darkened room, the OLED's ability to render shadow detail and maintain colour accuracy without any haloing is unmatched.

  • This leans toward the Samsung QN90F for people who: Watch TV primarily in a bright living room, want HDR content to truly 'pop' with intense highlights, and value vibrant, saturated colours that cut through ambient light.
  • This leans toward the LG OLED C5 for people who: Are serious about a cinematic viewing experience in a controlled, dark environment, crave the deepest blacks and the most natural-looking contrast, and want to see every subtle detail in shadows.

Performance: Processing and Motion

Both TVs are powered by sophisticated processors designed to upscale content, enhance colours, and manage motion. Samsung's Neo Quantum Processor 8K is a powerhouse, capable of upscaling lower-resolution content impressively and driving the Mini-LED backlight for precise local dimming. Its motion handling is generally excellent, keeping fast-paced action smooth.

LG's Alpha 11 Gen 5 AI Processor focuses on intelligent picture and sound enhancement. For OLEDs, motion handling is typically superb due to the near-instantaneous pixel response time, virtually eliminating motion blur. The C5's ability to handle complex gaming signals and its consistently smooth performance across various content types make it a strong contender. For most users, the day-to-day difference in upscaling and motion clarity will be subtle, with both TVs delivering a premium experience. However, the OLED's inherent pixel response gives it a slight edge in pure motion fluidity.

  • This leans toward the Samsung QN90F for people who: Appreciate Samsung's processing for its vibrant output and how it drives the Mini-LED backlight for bright scenes.
  • This leans toward the LG OLED C5 for people who: Prioritize the absolute smoothest motion clarity, especially in fast-paced gaming or sports, and benefit from LG's AI-driven picture enhancements for a natural look.

Camera Capability: Not Applicable

Neither the Samsung QN90F Neo QLED nor the LG OLED C5 include built-in cameras for video calls. Modern smart TVs typically rely on external webcams or smartphone integration for such functionalities. Therefore, this is a neutral category for both.

Battery & Charging: Not Applicable

Televisions do not have batteries or require charging in the conventional sense. They are powered directly from a wall outlet. This is a neutral category.

Software & Longevity: Smart Platforms and Updates

LG's webOS and Samsung's Tizen are both mature and feature-rich smart TV platforms. webOS is often praised for its intuitive interface and ease of use, with a consistent layout that makes navigation straightforward. Tizen, while also very capable, can sometimes feel a bit more cluttered but offers a wide array of apps and services.

In terms of longevity and software updates, both manufacturers provide regular updates to their smart TV platforms, including app store refreshes and occasional feature additions. However, neither platform is typically guaranteed for a specific number of years of major OS upgrades like a smartphone. For most users, the core functionality of the smart TV will remain relevant for many years. LG's inclusion of Dolby Vision support, which Samsung omits in favour of HDR10+, is a notable difference for content compatibility.

  • This leans toward the LG OLED C5 for people who: Prefer LG's user-friendly webOS interface and want broader HDR format support, including Dolby Vision.
  • This leans toward the Samsung QN90F for people who: Are already invested in the Samsung ecosystem or prefer the Tizen interface, and are comfortable with HDR10+ as their primary advanced HDR format.

Price & Value: Premium Investment

The LG OLED C5 typically comes in at a slightly lower price point than the Samsung QN90F, especially at launch or during common sales periods. This makes the C5 appear to offer slightly better value on paper, given its OLED technology which is generally more expensive to produce. However, 'value' is subjective and depends heavily on your viewing environment. If you need the brightness and reflection handling the QN90F offers, its higher price might be justified for your specific needs. If a dark room viewing experience is your priority, the C5 delivers that 'infinite contrast' experience at a more accessible premium price.

  • This leans toward the LG OLED C5 for people who: Are looking for the best possible contrast and black levels within a more budget-conscious premium TV purchase.
  • This leans toward the Samsung QN90F for people who: Are willing to invest more for superior brightness and reflection handling in challenging room conditions, recognizing that this is key to their viewing satisfaction.

Which one fits you?

If you watch TV in a bright, sunlit room: The Samsung QN90F's exceptional brightness and advanced anti-reflection technology make it the more suitable choice. You'll be able to enjoy vibrant colours and clear images without fighting glare.

If you are a cinephile who watches most content in a dark room: The LG OLED C5 will likely be your preference. Its perfect blacks, infinite contrast, and near-perfect viewing angles create an unparalleled immersive, cinematic experience.

If you are a serious gamer: Both offer excellent gaming features like 120Hz refresh rates, VRR, and ALLM. The LG C5's near-instantaneous pixel response time might give it a slight edge in motion clarity for competitive gaming, while the QN90F's brightness can be advantageous in some gaming scenarios.

If you want the most vibrant, eye-popping HDR experience: The Samsung QN90F's ability to hit much higher peak brightness levels will make HDR content feel more impactful and dazzling.

If you prioritize colour accuracy and subtle shadow detail in dark scenes: The LG C5's perfect blacks and self-emissive pixels allow for incredible detail and nuance in darker content that an LCD, even a Mini-LED, struggles to match.

If budget is a primary concern within the premium segment: The LG OLED C5 generally offers a more accessible entry point into top-tier TV performance, making it a strong value proposition for its picture quality.

The bottom line

Both the Samsung QN90F Neo QLED and the LG OLED C5 are exceptional televisions that represent the best of their respective technologies. The QN90F excels with its stunning brightness and superior handling of ambient light, making it a versatile performer for any room. The C5, with its perfect blacks and infinite contrast, delivers an unmatched cinematic experience, particularly in darker settings. The decision ultimately comes down to your specific viewing environment and what you prioritize most: the dazzling punch of a bright screen or the profound depth of perfect blacks. Choose the one that fits your life, and you'll have a fantastic TV for years to come.

Sponsored · Affiliate link
Upgrade your hardware

Trending SSDs, keyboards and PC parts at competitive prices.

Shop hardware
Ad

Discuss this story

Got a take, a correction, or a follow-up tip? Reply where you read — we read everything.

Found an error? File a correction at /corrections. Substantive corrections are logged publicly.

#TV#Samsung#LG#OLED#Neo QLED#Buying Guide
Get the 5 tech stories worth your time — 3× a week

One short email. The most important Hardware news, fact-checked, no fluff. Free, unsubscribe anytime.

More from Hardware

About the author
Serhat Er — Founder & Editor-in-Chief
Founder & Editor-in-Chief

Serhat Er founded Byte-Pulse to cover European tech that US blogs miss. He owns the editorial direction, reviews every AI and security story personally, signs off on each article before publish, and writes the in-depth buying guides and head-to-head comparisons. Based in Leverkusen, Germany. Reach out at editorial@byte-pulse.net.

AISecurityEuropean tech policyBuying guidesHardware comparisons
Editorially reviewed on . Spotted an error? Tell us.
From other sections

Don’t miss these

Pokémon TCG Movie Signals Strategic Media Pivot for The Pokémon Company
🎮 Gaming

Pokémon TCG Movie Signals Strategic Media Pivot for The Pokémon Company

A new Pokémon movie focused on the TCG is coming in 2027, marking a strategic pivot for the franchise as it navigates massive global fan engagement and logistical challenges.

By Byte-Pulse Newsroom·4h ago·7 min0
Apple's 'Deep Discounts': US Inventory Flush, Not European Bargains
📱 Mobile

Apple's 'Deep Discounts': US Inventory Flush, Not European Bargains

Byte-Pulse examines Apple's recent US sales, revealing that 'deep discounts' on popular devices like the iPhone 17 Pro and M3 iPad Air are less about consumer savings and more about clearing stock ahead of new launches. We critically assess whether these offers translate to real value for European buyers.

By Byte-Pulse Newsroom·Aug 19, 2026·7 min
D23 2026: Disney's Content Deluge Sparks Questions About Strategy
🌐 Web & Apps

D23 2026: Disney's Content Deluge Sparks Questions About Strategy

Byte-Pulse cuts through D23 hype: We dissect Disney's ambitious content slate, from Simpsons: Hit & Run to Ahsoka season 2, and question the real-world implications and European market strategy.

By Byte-Pulse Newsroom·Aug 15, 2026·4 min
eBay's $55.7M Cyberstalking Settlement: A Corporate Culture of Coercion Exposed
🛡️ Security

eBay's $55.7M Cyberstalking Settlement: A Corporate Culture of Coercion Exposed

Byte-Pulse investigates the eBay cyberstalking case, revealing a disturbing harassment campaign, executive involvement, and the broader implications for corporate ethics.

By Byte-Pulse Newsroom·Jul 29, 2026·4 min
GTA 6's Realism Gamble: Will Player Patience Pay Off?
🎮 Gaming

GTA 6's Realism Gamble: Will Player Patience Pay Off?

Byte-Pulse examines GTA 6's shift to ultra-realism, from complex Wanted systems to car refueling, and questions if 'ambition' justifies potential player friction.

By Byte-Pulse Newsroom·2 days ago·7 min
Android Auto vs. CarPlay: Open vs. Controlled Infotainment Ecosystems
📱 Mobile

Android Auto vs. CarPlay: Open vs. Controlled Infotainment Ecosystems

A deep dive into Android Auto's flexibility versus Apple CarPlay's curated experience, impacting user choice and OEM strategy

By Byte-Pulse Newsroom·Aug 16, 2026·3 min
Ad
Cookies & ads

We fund this site through ads (Google AdSense and others) and use analytics to see what works. Both may set cookies. You decide what is OK — your choice is remembered.

Details in our Privacy Policy.